2025:JHHC:37426 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.94 of 2025 ------ Bhima Hessa, S/o Late Devendra Hessa, R/o Village Beramundui, P.O. Andhari, P.S. Kumardungi, District West Singhbhum, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Mr. Amrendra Pratap Singh, the Principal Secretary, Department of School Education & Literacy, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Bhawan, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi (respondent No.2 in W.P.(S) No.211 of 2024). 3. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma, the Secretary, Department of School Education & Literacy, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Bhawan, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi (respondent No.3 in W.P.(S) No.211 of 2024). 4. Neha Arora, the Director (Primary), Department of School Education & Literacy, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Bhawan, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi (respondent No.4 in W.P.(S) No.211 of 2024) 5. Mr. Kuldeep Choudhary, the Deputy Commissioner-cum- Chairman, District Education Establishment Committee, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa, P.O. & P.S. Chaibasa, District West Singhbhum, (respondent No.5 in W.P.(S) No.211 of 2024) 6. Mr. Praveen Kumar, the District Superintendent of Education, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa, P.O. & P.S. Chaibasa, District West Singhbhum, (respondent No.6 in W.P.(S) No.211 of 2024) 7. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Paswan, the Area Education Officer, Kumar Dungi, having its office at Kumar Dungi Block, P.O. & P.S. Kumar Dungu, District West Singhbhum (respondent No.7 in W.P.(S) No.211 of 2024) 8. Mr. Raj Kumar Agarwal, the Accountant General (A & E), Jharkhand, Office at A.G. More, Doranda, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi (respondent No.8 in W.P.(S) No.211 of 2024) … … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.M. Sharma, Advocate For the O.P. (s) : Mr. Varun Prabhakar, AC to GP-III M/s Oishi Das, Advocate ----- 04/ 12.12.2025 Heard the parties. 2. It is submitted that a reasoned order has been passed 2025:JHHC:37426 2 by the opposite parties in compliance of order dated 29.04.2024 passed in W.P.(S) No.211 of 2024. It is further submitted that by the said reasoned order, the claim of the petitioner has been rejected. 3. Since the reasoned order has been passed, no contempt is made out. 4. Accordingly, this Contempt Proceeding is dropped. 5. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the reasoned order, he is at liberty to challenge the same before the appropriate Forum. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 12th December, 2025 Prashant. Cp-2 Uploaded on 15.12.2025