T.LAXMANA RAO,SRIKAKULAM DIST v. NPACS,PRESIDENT,SRIKAKULAM,&2
WP/21449/2012 · 2025-02-06
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38522 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38522 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010723032012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 21449/2012 Between: T.laxmana Rao,srikakulam Dist Npacs President Srikakulam 2 and Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. A PADMA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. L RANJITH KUMAR
2. GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 21449/2012 T.laxmana Rao,srikakulam Dist ...PETITIONER AND Npacs President Srikakulam 2 and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S):
GP FOR COOPERATION following:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3457] ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S)
Order:-
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. Hence, the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 06.02.2025 PNS