1 2025:CGHC:44261 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2344 of 2023 1 - Nadeem Akhtar S/o Ayub Khan Aged About 30 Years R/o House No. 116, Ward No. 03, Dafai No. 01 North Jhagrakhand, Thana Jhagrakhand, District Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur Chhattisgarh 2 - Ajmeri Khatun W/o Ayub Khan Aged About 52 Years R/o House No. 116, Ward No. 03, Dafai No. 01 North Jhagrakhand, Thana Jhagrakhand, District- Manendragarh-Chirmiri- Bharatpur Chhattisgarh 3 - Aaisha Khatun D/o Ayub Khan Aged About 25 Years R/o House No. 116, Ward No. 03, Dafai No.1 North Jhagrakhand, Thana Jhagrakhand, District - Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Isharat Begam, D/o Ayub Khan Aged About 23 Years R/o House No. 116, Ward No. 03, Dafai No. 01, North Jhagrakhand, Thana Jhagrakhand, District Manendragarh-Chirmiri-Bharatpur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Sho Police Thana Bhatgaon, District - Surajpur Chhattisgarh 2 - Ismanaz W/o Nadeem Akhtar, D/o Mohammad Abdul Mannan Khan Aged About 20 Years R/o Ward No. 8, Nagar, Panchayat Bhatgaon, Thana- Bhatgaon, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhuvneshwar Singh, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel lawyer MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2025.09.02 10:53:10 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 01.09.2025 1. Heard Mr. Bhuvneshwar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Hariom Rai, learned Panel Lawyer for respondent No.1 / State. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash the impugned FIR dated 22.05.2023, final report dated 05.07.2023 and Criminal Case No. 966/2023, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh stating that in the present matter, charges have already been framed against the petitioner and the same needs to be challenged further. 4. In view of the same, as prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to take recourse to law. 5. Learned Panel Lawyer appearing for respondent No.1 / State is present. 3 6. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet