[2025:RJ-JP:32980] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7695/2025 Vishambhar Dayal Sharma S/o Sohanlal Sharma, R/o Joshi Mohalla Nabhawala, P.s. Andhi, District Jaipur Rural. At Present 38, Brijvila Krishna Nagar T.t. Friend Colony, Lalkothi, Jaipur. (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8946/2025 Ranveer Sharma S/o Sundarlal, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Gaiyara, P.s. Raya, District Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, At Present Resident Of 38, Nehru Path Krishna Nagar Iind, Lalkothi, Jaipur. (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshay Sharma with Mr. Gaurav Rathore Mr. Himanshu Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Saurabh Pratap Singh Chouhan Mr. Ritul Sharma Mr. Vijay Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 21/08/2025 1. These two bail applications are filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the petitioner-accused Vishambhar Dayal Sharma S/o Sohanlal Sharma and Ranveer Sharma S/o Sundarlal in [2025:RJ-JP:32980] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-7695/2025] FIR No.248/2023 dated 18.06.2023 registered at P.S. Maujmabad, District – Jaipur Rural, whereby the petitioners- accused have charged under Sections 420, 406 and 120B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioner accused Vishambhar Dayal Sharma is 72 years old person and he has been falsely implicated in the case. He further submits that the investigation is complete and the charge- sheet has been filed. He submits that four cases were registered against this petitioner-accused and only in two cases, charge-sheet has been filed and in rest cases he has been released by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court. He further submits that the main accused is Mukesh Saravagi and his wife and both were not arrayed by the police and they were left out by police. He also submits that the transaction of complainant was with other persons and there is no direct transaction of land. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of Ranveer Sharma submits that this petitioner-accused is arrayed as an accused as he is Secretary of the society and there is no criminal antecedents against him and charge-sheet has been filed. He also submitted that the trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the petitioner-accused in custody. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant. 5. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that the complainant was assured for a land which is dispute free and [2025:RJ-JP:32980] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-7695/2025] but when complainant has visited the site he came to know that the land has already sold by these petitioners and the patta has been issued by them as President and Secretary of society under their signatures. 6. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted report received from Police Station Mokhampura, District Jaipur Rural. 7. Heard learned counsel for the parties and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 8. On basis of report registered by complainant Kailash Nath Bhargava, the matter is investigated and after investigation these two petitioners were arrested and after concluding trial, charge-sheet has been filed. 9. There are criminal antecedents against Vishambhar Dayal Sharma but in report of police it has been stated that some of them are under investigation for a fairly long time. 10. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the petitioners-accused are no more required in the investigation and they are in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the petitioners-accused. 11. Thus, these two bail applications filed on behalf of petitioners-accused are hereby allowed and the petitioners- accused Vishambhar Dayal Sharma S/o Sohanlal Sharma and Ranveer Sharma S/o Sundarlal are ordered [2025:RJ-JP:32980] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-7695/2025] to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The petitioners-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The petitioners-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The petitioners-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the petitioners-accused shall be liable to be cancelled. 12. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/88-89