Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38516 (AP)

Abburi Srinu, v. Government of Andhra Pradesh

WP/23290/2013 · 2025-07-03

R Raghunandan Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010721052013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 23290 OF 2013 Between: Abburi Srinu, S/o Venkaiah. aged about 42 years. Occ: Agriculture Mangamuru Village, Santanutalapadu, Prakasam District. R/o ...Petitioner AND 1. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayath Raj & Rural Department (Pts.lV) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & Urban Development (Ele.ll)Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3. Mangamuru Grampanchayath, Mangamuru, Santhanutalapadu Mandal Prakasam District rep.by its Special Officer 4. Special Officer, Mangamuru Grampanchayath, Santhanutalapadu Mandal, Prakasam District. 5. The District Collector & Special Officer, Ongole Municipality, at Ongole, Prakasam District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly a one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing G.O.Ms.No. 370 PR & RD, dt. 30-07-2013 and G.O.Ms.No. 377 MA & UD, dt. 30-07-2013 thereby merging petitioner's Mangamuru Grampanchayath into Ongolc Municipal Corporation as highly illegal, arbitrary and one without jurisdiction and also against all cannons of fair play and natural justice and also contrary to the provisions of G.O.Ms.No. 63, dt. 18-02-2006 and G.O.Ms.No. 542, dt. 3- 12-2007 and also offends Article 14 and 40 of the Constitution of India consequently set aside the and same to the extent of Mangamuru Grampanchayath is concerned. lA NO: 1 OF 2013(WVMP 2992 OF 2013 Between: The District Collector & Special Officer, Ongole Municipality, at Ongole Prakasam District. Petitioner/Respondent No.5 AND I.Abburi Srinu, S/o Venkaiah. aged about 42 years. Occ; Agriculture, R/o Mangamuru Village, Santanutalapadu, Prakasam District Writ Petitioner 2. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayath Raj & Rural Department (Pts.lV) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3. Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & Urban Development (Ele.ll)Department Hyderabad. 4. Mangamuru Grampanchayath, Mangamuru, Santhanutalapadu Mandal Prakasam District rep.by its Special Officer 5. Special Officer, Mangamuru Grampanchayath, Santhanutalapadu Mandal, Prakasam District. Secretariat, Respondents/Petitioner & Respondents 1 to 4/do Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed in W.P.M.P.No.28605 of 2013 in W.P.No.23290 of 2013 dt. 13-08-2013. lA NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP 28605 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the G.O.Ms.No. 370 PR & RD, dt. 30-07-2013 as well as G.O.Ms.No. 377 MA & UD, dt. 30-07-2013 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SITA RAM CHAPARLA Counsel for the Respondent No.1:GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2:GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondents No.3,4: SRI MATTEGUNTA SUDHIR Counsel for the Respondent No.5: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order; «' f APHC010721052013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 23290/2013 Between: 1.ABBURI SRINU,, S/0 VENKAIAH. AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS. OCC: MANGAMURU VILLAGE, R/0 AGRICULTURE, SANTANUTALAPADU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATH RAJ & RURAL DEPARTMENT (PTS.IV) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2.GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN (ELE.II)DEPARTMENT, SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT HYDERABAD. SECRETARIAT, MANGAMURU, SANTHANUTALAPADU MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT REP.BY ITS SPECIAL OFFICER GRAM PANCHAYATH, 3. MANGAMURU 4. SPECIAL OFFICER MANGAMURU GRAM PANCHAYATH SANTHANUTALAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. SPECIAL OFFICER, ONGOLE 5.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR MUNICIPALITY, AT ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): \ > Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therev\/ith, the High Court may be pleased tolssue a writ order or direction more particularly a one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing G.O.Ms.No. 370 PR & RD, dt. 30-07-2013 and G.O.Ms.No. 377 MA & UD, dt. 30-07-2013 thereby merging petitioner's Mangamuru Grampanchayath into Ongolc Municipal Corporation as highly illegal, arbitrary and one without jurisdiction and also against all cannons of fair play and natural justice and also contrary to the provisions of G.O.Ms.No. 63, dt.18-02-2006 and G.O.Ms.No. 542, dt. 3- 12-2007 and also offends Article 14 and 40 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same to the extent of Mangamuru Grampanchayath is concerned and to pass lA NO: 1 OF 2013(WVMP 2992 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed in W.P.M.P.No.28605 of 2013 in W.P.No.23290 of 2013 dt. 13-08-2013 and pass lA NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP 28605 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the G.O.Ms.No. 370 PR & RD, dt. 30-07-2013 as well as G.O.Ms.No. 377 MA & UD, dt. 30-07-2013 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.SITARAM CHAPARLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE 2.GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 3.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV The Court made the following order: The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted a letter, dated 26.06.2025, in the Registry, seeking to withdraw the present Writ Petition. The same is placed before this Court. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ' SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI. SITA RAM CHAPARLA, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. Two CCs to GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 4. Two CCs to GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 5.0ne CC to SRI. SRI MATTEGUNTA SUDHIR, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies nm HIGH COURT DATED:04/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 23290 OF 2013 x 16 JUL 2025 ffl •a^ Current Section ^ ^>i^OCSPATC»*l%- DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS