Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38513 (CHH)

SANJAY PANDEY v. Srijan Pandey

CRR/1218/2019 · 2025-07-13

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:32653 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 1218 of 2019 Sanjay Pandey S/o Late Shri Rajaram Pandey Aged About 40 Years ( Wrongly Mentioned As 51 Years In Order Sheet ), R/o. Government Quarter, Near Tahsil Office, Katghora, P.S. And Tahsil Katghora, District Korba Chhattisgarh At Present Resident Of Village Pachari, Tahsil Champa, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Applicant(s) versus Srijan Pandey Sanjay Pandey, Aged About 18 Years, Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Meenu Pandey, Wife Of Sanjay Pandey, Resident Of Bangalipara Gali No. 03, Ward No. 56, Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhttisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Non-applicant(s) For Applicant : None. For Non-applicant : None. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 14.07 .2025 . 1. None appears nor any representation made on behalf of the applicant as well as non-applicant to press this revision petition on KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 repeated calls. 2. By way of this revision, the applicant has prayed for following relief:- “It is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this application and stay the effect and operation of the impugned order dated 16.07.2018 passed by the learned judge of Family Court Bilaspur District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, presided by Shri K. Vinod Kujur, in Family Court District Misc. Criminal Case No. 132/2018, till final disposal of the instant revision, in the interest of justice.” 3. It appears that with the passage of time, the applicant has lost interest in pursuing this matter. 4. Accordingly, the revision is dismissed on this ground alone. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal