Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38512 (AP)

D. Yedukondalu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/34905/2018 · 2025-07-16

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010723522018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 34905/2018 Between: 1. D. YEDUKONDALU, S/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC, BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO. 10-33, AKULAVARI STREET, VINUKONDA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VINUKONDA, THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VINUKONDA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE VINUKONDA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 in taking action on the complaint dated 20-09-2012 given by the petitioner inspite of petitioner personal visits, as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondent Nos 3 and 4 to act upon the complaint and take action against the culprits in accordance with law, and to grant such other 2 relief of reliefs as this Honble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No. 3 and 4 herein to register the FIR pursuant to the complaint dated 20-09-2018, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the proposed respondent as party Respondent No.5 in the above W.P.No. 34905 of 2018, in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D KASIM SAHEB Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “….to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 in taking action on the complaint dated 20-09-2012 given by the petitioner inspite of petitioner personal visits, as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondent Nos 3 and 4 to act upon the complaint and take action against the culprits in accordance with law, and to grant such other relief of reliefs as this Honble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case…” 2. Heard Sri D.Kasim Saheb, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is no more and the writ petition may be dismissed as abated. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 5. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 17.07.2025 MH 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 129 WRIT PETITION NO: 34905/2018 Dt.17.07.2025 MH