MAMTA SARAN D/O KHETARAM SARAN v. SECRETARY, STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/14911/2025 · 2025-10-13
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38511 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38511 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:41688] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14911/2025
1. Mamta Saran D/o Khetaram Saran, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Jaisangsar, Sardarshahar, District Churu, State- Rajasthan-331403.
2. Divya D/o Sushil Kumar, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Mandi 465 Rd Damolai, Chhattargarh, District Anoopgarh, State Rajasthan- 334021. ----Petitioners Versus
1. Secretary, State Of Rajasthan, Department Of Skill Development Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Janpath, Jaipur.
2. The Directorate, Technical Education, Rajasthan Jodhpur, W-6 Residency Road, Jodhpur- 342001.
3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Secretary, Rajya Krishi Prabandh Sansthan Parisar, Durgapura, Jaipur- 302018. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 13/10/2025
1. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:-
“i) To issue appropriate order or direction to respondents to give appointment to the petitioners on the post of Junior Instructor (Electrician) in their respective categories, by considering the education qualification of the Petitioners in NTC/NAC Category. ii) To Direct the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioners in NTC/NAC Category as they are fulfilling all the requirements to the same.
[2025:RJ-JP:41688] (2 of 3) [CW-14911/2025] iii) To direct to respondents to deem the education qualification of the Petitioners in NTC/NAC Category. (iv) Any other order or relief, which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioners.”
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that inadvertently petitioners have selected wrong option about their qualification but their conduct is bona fide and after selection their candidature was rejected only on ground that the petitioners have filled wrong information about degree/diploma. He submits that both the petitioners have acquired minimum qualification required for consideration on the post of Junior Instructor (Electrician). He further submits that the controversy raised herein is considered by Hon’ble Division Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in case of Reena Choudhary Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. : D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No.1175/2024. He further submits that similar issue was also decided by another Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court on 01.11.2017 in case of Kavita Choudhary Vs. The Registrar (Examination), Rajasthan High Cout, Jodhpur and Anr. : D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.1700/2017. He submits that the respondents are under an obligation to consider the documents in light of ratio laid down by Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in matters referred by him.
3. Having considered submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners and also on perusal of orders as referred by learned counsel for the petitioners in cases of Reena Choudhary Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) and Kavita Choudhary Vs. The Registrar (Examination), Rajasthan High Cout, Jodhpur and Anr. (supra), it is appropriate to disposed of the
[2025:RJ-JP:41688] (3 of 3) [CW-14911/2025] writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to submit a representation raising the grounds.
4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 15 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation on basis of ratio referred hereinabove, relied by the petitioners but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/26