Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3851 (UTT)

AMINUDDIN KHAN v. SUDARSHAN KAPOOR

CLR/40/2020 · 2025-09-03

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:7829 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS IA 2327/2025 (For Withdrawal) In CLR No. 40 of 2020 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. (through V.C.) 1. Ms. Harshi Gupta, learned counsel for the revisionist. 2. Mr. Yogesh Pant, learned counsel for the respondents through V.C. 3. Withdrawal application has been moved by the revisionist on the ground that the parties have settled their dispute amicably and does not want to press the instant revision. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents Mr. Yogesh Pant admits this fact. The compromise entered in between the parties is also placed on record. 5. In view of the fact that the parties have settled their dispute by way of entering with the compromise amicably. 6. Withdrawal application is allowed. 7. Consequently, the instant revision is dismissed as withdrawn. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 03.09.2025 PR 2025:UHC:7829