Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38504 (JHR)

PARSURAM YADAV ALIAS PARSURAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./6323/2025 · 2025-11-10

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:33478 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 6323 of 2025 Parshuram Yadav @ Parsuram, aged about 33 years, son of Jagdish Yadav, presently residing at Kumhar Patti, Hari Mandir, P.O. Lodna, P.S. Dhanbad, District-Dhanbad, Jharkhand ...... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. Ajay Kr. Sah, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Kr. Keshri, A.P.P. 02/ 10.11.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Mayurhand P.S. Case No. 13 of 2024, registered under sections 379, 411, 414, 34 of the I.P.C, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Chatra. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in F.I.R. and his name has transpired in the confessional statement of the co-accused. He further submits that it has come in the investigation that Rs. 2000/- has been transferred to the driver of vehicle in question. He also submits that petitioner has received notice under section 35(3) of BNSS, 2023 and he has appeared before the Investigating Officer on 21.09.2025 and also handed over his mobile. He further submits that thereafter mobile has been returned to the petitioner. He then submits that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 11 of the petition. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that name of the petitioner has come in the confessional statement and mobile of the petitioner was used in talking with the driver. ( 2025:JHHC:33478 ) 5. Considering that petitioner has received notice under section 35(3) of BNSS, 2023 and he has appeared before the investigating officer and further handed over his mobile which was lateron returned to him and in view of petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court within two weeks from today and the learned court shall release the petitioner on terms and conditions and sureties as learned court deems fit and proper. 6. This anticipatory bail application is disposed of. Dt.10.11.2025 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-