Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38501 (MAD)

M/s.A.V.Thomas and Co. Ltd., v. The Secretary

WP/11942/2023 · 2025-03-11

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.11942 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 11.03.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.11942 of 2023 1. A.V.Thomas & Co.Ltd., Rep. by its Chief Officer-Admin & Corporate Affairs, M.Victor Niranjan, No.60, Rukmani Lakshmipathy Salai, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. 2. LaxmiNivas 3. Parade View, Commercial Office, Rep. by its Manager, Mr.Joseph M.Daniel, No.62, Rukmani Lakshmipathy Salai, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. 4. Poly Pipes India (P) Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, Mr.VinayHirawat, No.64, Rukmani Lakshmipathy Salai, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. ... Petitioners Vs 1. The Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, St.George Fort, Chennai – 600 009. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.11942 of 2023 2. The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai Police, No.132, EVK Sampath Road, Vepery, Chennai – 600 007. 3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Triplicane, Chennai. 4. The Inspector of Police, F-2, Police Station, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 to 4 in preventing any organisation or association to conduct meetings in any stretch of the Rukmani Lakshmipathy Salai (Marshalls Road) especially in front of the petitioners' Company/residential apartment at any point of time. For Petitioners : Mr.NM.Arunkumar For Respondents : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed for directing the respondents 2 to 4 to prevent any organisation or association from conducting meetings in 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.11942 of 2023 any stretch of Rukmani Lakshmipathy Salai (Marshalls Road), especially in front of the petitioners' company/residential apartment, at any point of time. 2. Heard the learned counsel for both sides and perused the materials available on record. 3. Considering the limited relief sought for in the petition, without expressing any opinion on merits of the writ petition, the fourth respondent is directed to consider the representation dated 10.01.2023 made by the first petitioner, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 11.03.2025 2/2 Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation/Yes/No kv 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.11942 of 2023 To 1. The Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, St.George Fort, Chennai – 600 009. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai Police, No.132, EVK Sampath Road, Vepery, Chennai – 600 007. 3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Triplicane, Chennai. 4. The Inspector of Police, F-2, Police Station, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. 5. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.11942 of 2023 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. kv W.P.No.11942 of 2023 11.03.2025 2/2 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis