THE BHIWADI INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. M/S CONNOISSEUR DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.
SAW/114/2019 · 2025-12-01
Inderjeet Singh, Ravi Chirania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38494 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38494 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:48604-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 114/2019
1. The Bhiwadi Integrated Development Authority, Bhiwadi, District Alwar (Rajasthan) Through Its Chief Executive Officer.
2. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Industries Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
3. The Land Acquisition Officer, Bhiwadi Integrated Development Authority, Bhiwadi, District Alwar (Rajasthan) ----Appellants Versus
1. M/s Connoisseur Developers Pvt. Ltd., Through Its Law Officer Shri Yogesh Sharma, Son Of Shri Hari Shankar Sharma, By Caste Brahmin, Resident Of 144-2, Ashram Mathura Road, New Delhi.
2. The Chief Town Planner (Ncr), Rajasthan, Nagar Nayojan Bhawan, J.l.n. Marg, Jaipur.
3. The Deputy Town Planner (Ncr), Urban Improvement Trust, Bhiwadi, Distt. Alwar (Raj.)
4. The District Collector, Alwar (Rajasthan).
5. M/s Star Rison Landmarks, Through Its Partner Shri Nitin Gupta, Resident Of A-26, New Krishan Park, Najabgarh Road, New Delhi.
6. M/s Krish Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Through M/s Krishi Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Authorised Signatory Sh. Anmol Verma S/o Sh. Hari Chand Verma Having Its Registered Office At Office No. 101, Krishi City Center, Tapukara, Alwar (Raj) ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. R. K. Mathur, Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Lucky Sharma, Advocate assisted by Mr. Aayush Goyal, Advocate. Mr. Atul Prakash, CEO, BIDA, Bhiwadi. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Akhil Simlote, Advocate assisted by Mr. Jitendra Mitruka, Advocate. Mr. Dikshant Jain, Advocate.
[2025:RJ-JP:48604-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-114/2019] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA
Order 01/12/2025 Today, the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants submits that the learned Single Judge while passing the
order dated 27.09.2018 in Para No.40 quashed the entire notification (declaration) dated 04.05.2009 issued by the State Government. Learned Senior Counsel further submits that only one petitioner challenged the said notification whereas lands of multiple khatedars were also involved in the said notification. Learned Senior Counsel prayed that impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge may be modified and made confined to the land as mentioned in the para no.9 of the writ petition. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has no objection to the submissions made by the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants. In that view of the matter, this appeal is partly allowed and the order dated 27.09.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in para no.40 is modified to the extent that the notification (declaration) dated 04.05.2009 is quashed qua the land mentioned in para no.9 of the writ petition.
(RAVI CHIRANIA),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Tushar/30