M/S MAA TARA TRANSPORT, THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR NAMELY AJAY KUMAR SHARMA v. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR
WPC/5680/2025 · 2025-12-16
Rajesh Shankar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38491 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38491 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:37748-DB
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No. 5680 of 2025
M/s. Maa Tara Transport, having its office at Near Old Bridge, Barganda, District-Giridih, through its Proprietor namely, Ajay Kumar Sharma
... ... Petitioner Versus
1. Food Corporation of India, through its Chairman and Managing Director, having its head office at Barakhamba Lane, New Delhi
2. The General Manager, Food Corporation of India, having its Regional Office at New Collectorate Building, Block-A, 4th Floor, Kutchery Road, PO-GPO, PS-Kotwali, Ranchi
3. The Assistant General Manager (Contract), Food Corporation of India, having its Regional Office at New Collectorate Building, Block-A, 4th Floor, Kutchery Road, PO-GPO, PS-Kotwali, Ranchi
4. The Divisional Manager, Food Corporation of India having its Divisional Office at Deo Mansion, Jagrity Nagar, Karnibagh, Deoghar
5. The Manager (Contract), Food Corporation of India having its Divisional Office at Deo Mansion, Jagrity Nagar, Karnibagh, Deoghar
6. Grievance Redressal Committee, Zonal Office (East), Food Corporation of India, through its Chairman-cum-Director having its office at 10A, Middleton Row, Kolkata … Respondents
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner
: Mr. Rahul Lamba, Advocate
Mr. Aditya Mohan Khandelwal, Advocate For the Respondents
: Mr. Nipun Bakshi, Advocate
Mr. Shubham Sinha, Advocate -----
Order No. 03
Dated: 16.12.2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to assail the order dated 09.10.2025 whereby considering the opinion of the Grievance Redressal Committee, the Executive Director, Food Corporation of India, Zonal Office (East Zone), Kolkata has passed the aforesaid order.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the said prayer.
2025:JHHC:37748-DB
2
3. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
4.
The interim order dated 25.09.2025 stands vacated.
5.
Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, also stands
disposed of.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J.)
(Rajesh Shankar, J.) December 16, 2025 Manish/Ritesh/N.A.F.R.