Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38491 (AP)

BANAVATH VENKATA MALLESWARA NAIK, KHAMMAM DT., v. THE STATE OF AP., REP PP AND ANR.,

CRLRC/1880/2017 · 2025-09-10

T Mallikarjuna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010722882017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1880/2017 Between: 1. BANAVATH VENKATA MALLESWARA NAIK, KHAMMAM DT.,, S/O. LATE DHARMA NAIK, EMPLOYEE, ASSISTANT MANAGER, ANDHRA BANK, KHAMMAM, KHAMMAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP REP PP AND ANR, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD. 2. BANAVATH SANDHYA RANI, W/O. VENKATA MALLESWARA RAO, D/O. GUGULOTHU VENKATA RAM NAIK, R/O. D.NO.17-1-16/4, LAKSHMIVARAPUPETA, GUN BAZAR, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased tobe call for the entire records pertaining to the order dt. 20.05.017 in CrI.M.P.No.377 of 2017 in CrI.A.No.152 of 2017 on the file of the Court of Judge, Family Court-Cum-VII Additional District Judge, West Godavari, Eluru, set aside with regard to payment of maintenance is concerned alone and pass such other order or orders as this Honible Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 2992 OF 2017 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the CrI.M.P.No.3p of 2017 in Crl.A.No.152 of 2017 On the file of the Court of Judge, Family CourtCumNII Additional District Judge, West Godavari, Eluru, with regard to payment of maintenance of Rs.15,000/- alone and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. G RONALD RAJU 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1880/2017 ORDER:- This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. aggrieved by the order dated 20.05.2017 passed in Crl.M.P.No.377 of 2017 in Crl.A.No.152 of 2017, passed by the learned Judge, Family Court- cum-VII Additional District Judge, West Godavari, Eluru. 2. Heard. Perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous due to the disposal of Crl.A.No.152 of 2017 on 11.02.2020. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Criminal Revision Case, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Dated: 11.09.2025 SCH 4 58 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO:1880 OF 2017 Dated: 11.09.2025 SCH 5 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AT AMARAVATI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO:1880 OF 2017 PROCEEDING SHEET SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 02. 11.09.2025 TMR, J The Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. (Vide Separate Order) ______ TMR, J SCH