[2025:RJ-JP:20067] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2059/2025 1. Ramswaroop Jat S/o Shri Kanaram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Shiv Vihar Bajrang Colony, Ward No. 01, Behind Balaji Mandir, Kishangarh, District Ajmer. 2. Praveen Giri S/o Shri Arjun Giri, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Prikarma Marg, Badi Basti, Pushkar, District Ajmer. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Harfool Kumar S/o Bhairuram Sharma, R/o Nogal Ladi, Chandrapur Jatan, Amer, Madanganj, District Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshat Chaudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP Mr. Aditya Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 13/05/2025 1. This petition under Section 528 B.N.S.S. is filed, with prayer to quash the entire criminal proceeding of Criminal Case No.914/2024 (CIS No.2445/2024) arising out of FIR No.267/2021 registered at Police Station Madanganj, District Ajmer presently pending in the court of Sr. Civil Judge and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.1, Kishangarh District Ajmer for offences under Sections 420, 406, 120-B of IPC and Section 4/5 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978, on the basis of compromise effectuated between the parties herein, in respect of their inter-se dispute. [2025:RJ-JP:20067] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-2059/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that learned Trial Court has already recorded the presence of petitioners and complainant and has affirmed the compromise for the offence under Section 420 IPC. 3. Learned counsel for both the parties have submitted that the instant dispute is in personam in nature and both the parties have settled their disputes amicably. 4. Heard and considered. 5. In this regard, this Court deems it appropriate to place reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] and Ramgopal Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh reported in [2022 (14) SCC 531], relevant portion of the aforesaid is reproduced below: “12. The High Court, therefore, having regard to the nature of the offence and the fact that parties have amicably settled their dispute and the victim has willingly consented to the nullification of criminal proceedings, can quash such proceedings in exercise of its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are non- compoundable.” 6. In view of legal proposition of law laid down by the Apex Court in aforementioned case, and considering the personal nature of dispute, which has been amicably settled between parties, this Court deems it just and proper to allow the present misc. petition. Compromise is taken on record. 7. Considering the aforementioned, the present criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and the FIR No. 267/2021 [2025:RJ-JP:20067] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-2059/2025] registered at Police Station Madanganj, District Ajmer with all consequential proceedings, is hereby quashed and set aside. 8. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/30