Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38482 (JHR)

SUNNY RAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8871/2025 · 2025-09-26

Rajesh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:30336 1 B.A. No.8871 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8871 of 2025 1. Sunny Ram, aged about 33 years, son of Raju Ravidas, resident of Koyari Tola, Ravidas Mohalla, P.O. and P.S. Ramgarh, District-Ramgarh. 2.Sonu Ram, aged about 34 years, son of Chhotelal Ram, resident of Village- Parsetia, Ρ.Ο. and P.S. Ramgarh, District-Ramgarh. .......Petitioner Vrs. The State of Jharkhand .......... Opposite Party ….... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner : Ms. Priyanka Agrawal, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabhu Dayal Agrawal, Spl.P.P. 02/26.09.2025 Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for the State. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the applicants, who are in custody since 12.07.2025 in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 183 of 2025 registered for the offence under section 49,318(4),61(2),317(1),111,275,276,286 of the BNS, Sections 22(b) of NDPS Act and 27(b)(ii) and 18(c) of the Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1945, pending in the court of learned Sessions Judge, Ramgarh. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicants does not want to press the bail application of applicant no.1 Sunny Ram. 4. Accordingly, the instant bail application, so far as applicant no.1 Sunny Ram is concerned, is dismissed as not pressed. 5. So far as applicant no.2 Sonu Ram is concerned, it has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part. 6. Innocence has been claimed by the learned counsel for the applicant and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. From the possession of applicant no.2, from the left pocket of his pant 25 pieces pentazocine lactate injection IP RIDOOF and insulin syringe have been recovered. Two criminal cases have been reported but those are not related to NDPS Act. 2025:JHHC:30336 2 B.A. No.8871 of 2025 7. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 8. Considering the period of custody, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant no.2 Sonu Ram on bail. 9. Accordingly, the applicant no.2 Sonu Ram, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Ramgarh in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 183 of 2025, subject to condition that one of the bailor will be the father of the applicant no.2; further the applicant no.2 will submit self-attested photocopy / photocopies of his Aadhaar Card and also submit his mobile number(s) before the learned trial court which he will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court and the applicant no.2 is also directed to report once in a month to the concerned police station. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) 26.09.2025 A.Mohanty