Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3848 (AP)

DUGGENA CHANDRABABU NAIDU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/1452/2025 · 2025-01-22

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 1452 OF 2025 Between: Duggena Chandrababu Naidu, S/o Venkata Subbaiah, Aged Years, R/o D.No. 10/87 2, Chitwel Road, Kodur Village and Post, Kodur, YSR Kadapa District, A.P. about 42 ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. The District Collector, YSR Kadapa District, A.P. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, YSR Kadapa District,A.P. 4. The Tahsildhar, Obulavaripalli Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, A.P ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in thb nature of Writ of Mandamus questioning the inaction of the Respondents in not issuing the Pattadhar Passbooks and title deeds and mutation of revenue adangals in the name of the Petitioner in Sy Nos.938,939 and 940 admeasuring to an extent of Ac. 10.00 Cents of Bommavaram Obulavaripalli, YSR Kadapa District Representations made by the Petitioner from dated 13-12-2024 Village even inspite of number of to till date as illegal and arbitrary and violations of natural principles of Justice and violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution consequently direct the Respondents to consider the representation of the of India and petitioner and afterwards issue the Pattadhar Passbook Petitioner according to the law and in accordance with procedure. and title deed to the lA NO: 1 OF 207fi Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied in support of the petition, the High Court may be pieased to direct the Respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner and to make proper enquiry and afterwards issue the Pattadhar Passbook and title deed to the Petitioner accordance with procedure without any bias, by the respondent authorities and pending disposal of the Writ Petition. according to the law and in Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI U. KANAKA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4; RAJU SRI K. ARJUN CHOWDARY, AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER [3328] APHC010023202025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Ej^S Vc WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENl RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 1452/2025 Between: 1.DUGGENA CHANDRABABU NAIDU, S/0 VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS. R/0 D.NO. 10/87 2, CHITWEL ROAD, KODUR VILLAGE AND POST, KODUR. YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT.SECRETARIAT BULDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR. YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.A.P. 3.THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.A.P. 4.THE TAHSILDHAR, OBULAVARIPALLI MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.A.P ! ...RESPONDENT(S): V Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.U KANAKA RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE T The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri U.Kanaka Raju. learned Counsel for the Petitioner K.Arjun Chowdary, learned Assistant Government Pleader. and Sri 2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to the Applications submitted by the Writ Petitioner dated 13.12.2024 (Ex P2) along with Representation of the same date (Ex.P3). 3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this deems it appropriate to dispose of this Writ Petition case, this Court at the admission stage, without going into the merits, directing the Tahsildar, Obulavaripalli (Respondent No.4) to consider the Application Mandal and the Representation (mentioned supra) and pass a Speaking Order in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from today and furnish a copy of such Order to all the interested parties. Needless to state that the Respondent No.4 is statutorily obligated to adhere to the Principles of Natural Justice by issuing advance Notice to all the interested parties including the Writ Petitioner herein , consider their submissions/objections and documents, if any, before passing the final Order. Writ Petitioner is directed to submit a copy of this Order to the Respondent No.4 within one week from today. With these observations and directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. 4. SD/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// I SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. The District Collector, YSR Kadapa District 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, YSR Kadapa 4. The Tahsildhar, Obulavaripalli Mandal, 5. One CC to Sri U. Kanaka Raju, Advocate 6. Two CCs to GP for Revenue 7. Three CD Copies. Secretariat Buildings , A.P. District,A. P. YSR Kadapa District, A.P - [OPUC] High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] ssb w t HIGH COURT DATED:22/01/2025 ORDER WP.No.1452 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS