APHC010724032018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 35029/2018 Between: 1. T. BHASKARAIAH, S/O KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, WORKING AS BILL COLLECTOR, SRIKALAHASTI CO-OPERATIVE TOWN BANK LTD., M.G. STREET, SRIKALAHASTI - 517644, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRIKALAHASTI CO- OPERATIVE TOWN BANK LTD., M.G. STREET, SRIKALAHASTI-517644, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE COMMISSIONER/REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, A.P.SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE OFFICER, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR/DIVISIONAL COOPERATIVE OFFICER, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE STATE OF A P, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE AND CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. POODATTU AMARENDER Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) 2. . The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.35029 OF 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Clerk cum Cashier based on his seniority and keeping in view of his disability as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to promote the petitioner to the post of Clerk-Cum-Cashier in the 1st respondents Bank, based on his seniority and also keeping in view of his physical disability, on par with his Juniors with all service and monitory benefits and to pass…” 2. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that NOC was already issued to the writ petitioner to engage another counsel. The petitioner did not engage any counsel to prosecute the matter, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 22.09.2025 Pmk 4 10 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:35029 OF 2018 Date: 22.09.2025 Pmk