Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38478 (PNJ)

M/S SB ELECTRICAL CO. v. SURENDER SANGWAN AND ANOTHER

COCP/1506/2025 · 2025-05-13

Vikram Aggarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (211) COCP-1506-2025 Date of Decision: 13.05.2025 M/s S D Electricals Co. Through its authorized representative Sukhbir Duhan …Petitioner Versus Surender Sangwan (Municipal Engineer) O/o Municipal Committee, near bus stand, MC Bawani Khera, Bhiwani and another …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Kanishk Swaroop, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Jagdish Manchanda Advocate Mr. Devyansh, Advocate & Mr. Nischal Chetanya Manchanda, Advocate for the respondents. **** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL) Learned counsel for the respondents has produced a copy of order dated 10.05.2025 passed in compliance with the directions issued by a Coordinate Bench in CWP No. 32603 of 2024 on 03.12.2024. As per the said order, it has been observed that the amount of third and final bill is pending and the same will be paid to the petitioner within 90 days. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the directions issued by the Coordinate Bench, the representation was to be decided within a period of three months and the payment was to be made within a further period of three months failing which it would entail interest at the rate of 6% per annum along with costs of Rs.50,000/-. 3. Since the said period of six months i.e., three months for deciding the representation and further period of three months for making REKHA SHARMA 2025.05.14 06:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh COCP No. 1506 of 2025 -2- the payment is yet to expire, no further orders are required to be passed by this Court, at this stage. However, in case the directions passed on 03.12.2024, are not complied with in letter and spirit, it would always be open to the petitioner to approach this Court again. 4. In view thereof, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition. Rule stands discharged and the contempt petition stands disposed off. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE May 13, 2025 Rekha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No REKHA SHARMA 2025.05.14 06:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh