SHANTARAM S/O LAXMAN SAVANT v. PUNDALIK S/O DATTU PATIL
MFA/102058/2014 · 2025-10-17
Chillakur Sumalatha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38475 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38475 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14085 MFA No. 102058 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 102058 OF 2014 (MV-I)
BETWEEN:
SRI. SHANTARAM S/O. LAXMAN SAVANT, AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: H.NO.48, MALANKALE, PO: IDALHOND, TAL: KHANAPUR, DIST: BELGAUM. …APPELLANT
(BY SRI. PRASADKUMAR GUNAKI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. PUNDALIK S/O. DATTU PATIL, AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE COOLIE, C/O: KALLAPPA PARASHURAM PATIL, R/O: KANGRALI, TAL & DIST: BELGAUM.
2.
THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., NEAR KOLHAPUR CIRCLE, K.L.E. HOSPITAL ROAD, BELGAUM.
GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DHARWAD
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14085 MFA No. 102058 of 2014
3.
MAHESH NARAYAN SHIMANAGOUDAR, AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. DEVALATTI, TQ: KHANAPUR, DIST: BELAGAVI.
AMENDMENT CARRIED OUT AS PER THE ORDER DATED 25.07.2016 …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SANJAY S. KATAGERI, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. SURESH S. GUNDI, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
SRI. HARISH S. MAIGUR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLE ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 03/03/2014 IN M.V.C.NO.2748/2012 PASSED BY THE FAST TRACK COURT II AND MEMBER ADDITIONAL M.A.C.T.
BELGAUM, BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL AND DISMISS THE PETITION AGAINST THE APPELLANT HEREIN AND ALSO REDUCE THE COMPENSATION, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14085 MFA No. 102058 of 2014
CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA)
No representation on the appellant’s side on call. There was no representation on the appellant’s side even on 10.09.2025 and 08.10.2025. Though the matter is list under the caption ‘for dismissal’, yet there is no representation on this day. Therefore, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
2. Amount if any deposited be transmitted to the concerned Tribunal immediately.
Sd/- (CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE
RH CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9