IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI TUESDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1051 OF 2013 Between: Syakam Sambasiva Rao, S/o. Nageswara Rao, Aged about 40 years, Occ: Employee, R/o. Patamatalanka, Seva Nikethan Road, Vijayawada. ...Revision Petitioner Respondent/Respondent AND 1. Sykam Nagalakshmi, W/o. Sambasiva Rao, Aged about 40 years, C/o. K.Panduranga Rao, R/o. H.No. 10-13-11/32, 13th ward Bose Road, Repalle 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P, Hyderabad. ...Respondent/Complainant Revision filed under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to present this Memorandum of Criminal Revision Case to the Hon'ble Court against the order made in Cross Appeal No. 357 of 2012 on the file of the Sessions Division of Guntur Before the V Additional Sessions Judge (FTC) Guntur dt.01.03.2013. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SUNKARA RAJENDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.1: M/S VARA LAKSHMI CHEKURI Counsel for the Respondent No.2: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ^e Court made the following Order: APHC010723332013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) if [3521] TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No: 1051/2013 Between: Syakam Sambasiva Rao ...PETITIONER AND Sykam Nagalakshmi Another and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: ...RESPONDENT{S) 1.SUNKARA RAJENDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.VARA LAKSHMI CHEKURI 2.- 3. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is filed against the order dated 01.03.2013, passed in Cross Appeal No.357 of 2012 on the file of the Sessions Division of Guntur before the V Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Guntur. 2. Mr.Bomasani Ravi, learned counsel representing Sri Sunkara Rajendra Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the revision may be dismissed as withdrawn. He also made an endorsement on the bundle to that effect. 3. Recording the above submission, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// p-SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Sessions Division of Guntur Before the V Additional Sessions Judge (FTC) Guntur, (with records if any) One CC to Sri. Sunkara Rajendra Prasad, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to M/s. Vara Lakshmi Chekuri, Advocate [OPUC] Two CC to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravathi [OUT] The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Three CD Copies 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. YM sree HIGH COURT DATED:04/03/2025 ORDER CRLRC.No.1051 of 2013 ^ 21 MA» 2025 A ^ Curnnt Section DISMISSING THE CRL.R.C. AS WITHDRAWN