Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38468 (CAL)

BIJOY NASKAR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/3080/2025 · 2025-09-26

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

ADSL/ 1 26.09.2025 Bpg. C.R.M.(A) 3080 of 2025 With CRAN 1 of 2025 Mr. Bijoy Naskar Versus The State of West Bengal Mr. Pawan Kumar Gupta Mr. A.K. Hazra Ms. Sofia Nesar Ms. Soumi Chatterjee. …for the petitioner. Mr. Aniket Mitra Mr. Sachit Talukdar. ...for the State. An application being CRAN 1 of 2025 has been taken out in connection with CRM(A) 3080 of 2025. The application states that during the pendency of the application for anticipatory bail, the petitioner has been arrested. In view of the petitioner having been arrested, the application for anticipatory bail being CRM(A) 3080 of 2025 has become infructuous. Since this Court did not have an opportunity to go into the merits of the application for anticipatory bail, I direct the learned Magistrate before whom the accused is produced will independently consider the application for bail of the petitioner. Accordingly, CRAN 1 of 2025 and CRM(A) 3080 of 2025 are disposed of. 2 All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)