Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38466 (RAJ)

MRS. VEENA DEVI SETHI W/O LATE SHRI NIRMAL KUMAR SETHI v. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

CW/14833/2025 · 2025-10-03

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:40087] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14833/2025 1. Mrs. Veena Devi Sethi W/o Late Shri Nirmal Kumar Sethi, Aged About 68 Years, Resident Of House No. 64, G.s. Road, Ward No. 6, Dimapur - 797112, Nagaland,. 2. Mr. Amit Kumar Sethi S/o Late Shri Nirmal Kuamr Sethi, Aged About 42 Years, Resident Of House No. 64, G.s. Road, Ward No. 6, Dimapur-797112, Nagaland. 3. Mrs. Late Jain D/o Late Shri Nirmal Kumar Sethi, Aged About 44 Years, Resident S D Tower, Flat No. 3D, Kestopur West, Shreetama Block-A, Prafulla Kanan, North 24 Parganas, West Bengal - 700101. 4. Mrs. Tripti Jain D/o Late Shri Nirmal Kumar Sethi, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Asimshova Building, Flat No. 5F, 22A, Loudon Street, Crossing Of Park Street And Loudon Street, Kolkata, West Bengal - 700016. 5. Mrs. Priti Jain D/o Late Shri Nirmal Kumar Sethi, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of C-1787, Near Vyapar Kendra, Palam Vihar, Kartarpuri, Gurugram, Haryana - 122017. ----Petitioners Versus Jaipur Development Authority, Through Its Commissioner, Having Its Office Situated At Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jda Building, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devendra Sharma for Mr. Bal Ram Vashisth For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 03/10/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners have given legal notices dated 03.03.2025 and [2025:RJ-JP:40087] (2 of 2) [CW-14833/2025] 30.06.2025 marked as annexure-P-9-10, howsoever, the same are not considered by the competent authority. It is further submitted that plot no.51 is given a distinguishable treatment. In the facts and circumstances, respondent No.1 is directed to consider the representation of petitioners dated 03.03.2025 and 30.06.2025 referred as annexure-P-9-10 in light of the judgment encapsulated in Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. reported in (SBCWP No. 1665/2024; Neutral Citation: 2024:RJ-JP:5792) and circular dated 19.02.2024 passed by Chief Secretary, Rajasthan within a period of 30 days. The petitioners are also given a liberty to mark presence before the respondent or the concerned Competent Officer on 14.10.2025 at 11:00 a.m., to tender further submissions on the said date; the same may be considered in accordance with law specifically qua the contention vis-a-vis bias treatment qua plot no.51. In light of the above, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/7