Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38465 (RAJ)

MUKESH KUMAR SAINI S/O ARJUN LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLBC/8/2025 · 2025-11-20

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:46933] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No. 8/2025 Mukesh Kumar Saini S/o Arjun Lal, R/o Ajeetgarh Road Thoi, Sikar. ----Applicant Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through PP .......Respondent 2. Prahladram S/o Birkharam D/o Shivshankar Sharma, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Ajeetgarh Road Thoi, P.S. Thoi, Dist. Sikar. ----Accused-Non-applicant For Applicant(s) : Mr. Amit Dadhich For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Ms. Arti Sharma, PP For Accused : Mr. Nikhil Saini HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 20/11/2025 1. The instant S.B. Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No. 8/2025 is filed under Section 483(3) of BNSS in FIR No.0073/2021 registered at Police Station Thoi District Sikar for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 336 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that bail was granted to the accused/non-applicant in the year 2021, whereas the instant Bail Cancellation Application has been filed in the year 2025. It is further submitted that the criminal proceedings were initiated by the non-applicant on account of a property dispute. Learned counsel has also submitted that three other FIRs have [2025:RJ-JP:46933] (2 of 2) [CRLBC-8/2025] been registered alleging repeated offences relating to the property and incidents of violence. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has supported the instant Bail Cancellation Application. 4. Having heard the submissions made, and considering that these FIRs arise out of separate and distinct causes of action, this Court is not inclined to allow the present Bail Cancellation Application. 5. Accordingly, the instant Bail Cancellation Application is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/219