AJAY PRASHER 2025.09.16 14:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-8425-2025 (O&M) -2- prefer a reply to the bank u/s 13 (3A) of the SARFAESI Act and the same ought to be availed by the petitioners. 4. Considering the fact that petitioner No.2, one of the borrowers, is 85% disabled and petitioner No.1 is his wife and is a home-keeper and has alleged that both the sons are separated and do not financially help the borrowers, the bank is directed to take a sympathetic view of the case of the petitioners, after receiving the reply u/s 13 (3A) of the SARFAESI Act, if submitted by the petitioners within a period of 30 days from today. 5. Unless the reply is considered, as submitted u/s 13 (3A) of the SARFAESI Act, and decided by speaking orders, no further coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioners. 6. This petition stands disposed of accordingly. (SHEEL NAGU) CHIEF JUSTICE (SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 12.09.2025 Ajay Prasher Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No AJAY PRASHER 2025.09.16 14:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document