<0010721222011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH-^ AT AMARAVATI MONDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, THE CHIEF JUSTICE^ AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI^ WRIT APPEAL NO: 753 OF 2011 ^ Writ Appeal under clause l5^of the Letters Patent Appeal against the order dated 18.08.2011. in WP No.20834 of 2011 on the file of the High Court. ^ Between: Medical Council of India, Rep by its Secretary Pocket 14, Sector 8 Dwarka, New Delhi - 110 075. ...Appellant/1®* Respondent AND 1. Aditya Educational Society 6-2-13, Chinna Bazaar, Srikakulam. A.P. 532001, rep by its Chairman, Dr. M.M.Vilekar. Great Eastern Medical School, Ragolu, Srikakulam. Rep by its Director Dr. M.M.Vilekar. Dr M M Vilekar, S/o Maruti Rao Vilekar, R/o 6-2-13, Chinna Bazaar, Srikakulam.A.P. 532 001. 2. 3. ... Respondents/Petitioners ^ Union of India, Rep by its Secretary, Pocekt 14, Sector 8 Dwarka, New Delhi - 110 075. Dr N T R University of Health Sciences, Andhra Pradesh, Vijayawada. Krishna District, rep by its Registrar. 4. 5. ...Respondents/Respondents lA NO: 1 OF 2011(WAMP 1788 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the orders dated 18.08.2011 passed in WPMP No.25316 of 2011 in WP.No.20834 of 2011, pending disposal of the above writ appeal. — Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI VISWANATH CHALLA LEARNED COUNSEL REPRESENTING SRI VIVEK CHANDRA SEKHAR S ^ Counsel for the Respondent No. 4: SRI B MAYUR REDDY ^ Counsel for the Respondent No. 5: SRI D V NAGARJUNA BABU The Court made the following order: "T IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI Bench Sr.No:-1 [3483] APHC010721222011 WRIT APPEAL NO: 753 of 2011 Medical Council of India, represented by its Secretary, New Delhi. ...Appellant Vs. Aditya Educational Society and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Appellant Sri Viswanath Challa, learned counsel representing Sri S. Vivek Chandra Sekhar Advocate for Respondents CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE ; 21®^ July 2025 PC ; Sri Viswanath Challa, learned counsel representing Sri S. Vivek Chandra Sekhar, learned counsel for the appellant, states that the matter has been rendered infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is disposed of as infructuous. In case any cause still survives, it would be open to the appellant to approach this Court for restoration of the present appeal. No costs. f 2 Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/-M.RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTTON OFFICER To, One CC to Sri. Vivek Chandra Sekhar S Advocate [OPUC]_ One CC to Sri. D V Nagarjuna Babu Advocate [OPUC]^-' One CC to Deputy Solicitor General of India [OPUC] One CC to Sri. B Mayur Reddy Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies GSC 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. HIGH COURT DATED:21/07/2025 ORDER WA NO. 753 OF 2011 DISPOSING THE WA AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS