Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38453 (AP)

M.Vijaya Dayakar v. Petati Raja Mohan

CRLRC/2616/2018 · 2025-07-10

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010721362018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2616/2018 Between: M.VIJAYA DAYAKAR, S/O.PETERU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O.KONDAPALLI VILLAGE, NEAR OLD POLICE STATION, IBRAHIMPATNAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PETATI RAJA MOHAN, W/O.RAJA RAO, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O.7-11/1-15, MAHANTIPURAM, WYNCHIPET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. PETETI SURYA DURGA, W/O. RAJA MOHAN, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O.7-11/1-15, MAHANTIPURATN, WYNCHIPET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, HYDERABAD ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to call for the entire records of Order dated 20-06-2018 in CrI.M.P.No.1119 of 2018 in C.C.No.823 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Vijayawada and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in C.C.No.823 of 2015 on the file of the court of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Vijayawada, Krishna District pending disposal of the above Criminal Revision Case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. G L NARASIMHA RAO The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the main case itself was ended in acquittal. Hence, the criminal revision case has become infructuous. In view of the above, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 11.07.2025 KAS