SHAIK ABDUL KHADAR JILANI v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/34230/2018 · 2025-05-08
Ninala Jayasurya
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38450 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38450 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010709562018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] FRIDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 34230/2018 Between: Shaik Abdul Khadar Jilani ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. EADARA PEDDANNA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following ORDER:-:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous.
2. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA ,J 09.05.2025 LSP
2
NJS, J
W.P.NO.34230 OF 2018
135 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION NO: 34230/2018
09.05.2025 LSP