IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 142 CWP-8523-2025 Date of decision: 26.03.2025 VIRENDER KUMAR AND OTHERS ….PETITIONERS Vs. HARYANA STATE AGRICULTURE MARKETING BOARD AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. S.K. Garg, Advocate for the petitioners. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to fix their pay at par with their juniors. 2. The petitioners claim that their juniors are getting more salary/pension because of pay anomaly. It is settled law that nobody can be paid lesser salary than his juniors. The petitioners have filed representation but to no avail. 3. Ms. Rajni Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana submits that petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 retired a couple of years back and they did not raise objection while in service. Nevertheless, the representation of petitioners would be considered including question of limitation within 3 months from today. MANOJ KUMAR 2025.03.27 10:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-8523-2025 -2- 4. In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of. It is hereby made clear that in case representation of the petitioners is accepted, they would be entitled to revised pay/pension from the date of filing petition before this Court. 5. Disposed of accordingly. 26.03.2025 [JAGMOHAN BANSAL] manoj JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MANOJ KUMAR 2025.03.27 10:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document