ANUJ KUMAR v. UNION OF INDIA , THROUGH MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS & ORS.
W.P.(C)/6556/2025 · 2025-05-20
Ajay Digpaul, C Hari Shankar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38446 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38446 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.(C) 6556/2025
$~61 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6556/2025
ANUJ KUMAR
.....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Nisha Dhaka, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA , THROUGH MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS & ORS.
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Anshuman Singh, Sr. PC with Mr. Vivek Nagar, GP for UOI
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL
ORDER (ORAL) %
20.05.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
1. The only prayer of the petitioner in this writ petition is for a direction to the respondents to decide the appeal preferred by the petitioner under Section 117(2) of the Border Security Force Act,
19681.
2. Mr. Anshuman Singh, learned Senior Panel Counsel for the respondents undertakes on instructions that the petitioner’s appeal would be disposed of within a period four weeks. The respondents shall remain bound by the said statement.
3. Accordingly, we dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondents to dispose of the petitioner’s appeal preferred under
1 “BSF Act, 1968”, hereinafter Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:23.05.2025 19:04:53 Signature Not Verified
W.P.(C) 6556/2025
Section 117(2) of the BSF Act within a period of four weeks and to communicate a decision to the petitioner forthwith.
4. Needless to say, the rights of the petitioner, should the petitioner continue to remain aggrieved by the decision of the respondents, shall stands reserved. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
AJAY DIGPAUL, J.
MAY 20, 2025/aky
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:23.05.2025 19:04:53