APHC010719312018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 34714 OF 2018 Between: Y. Nasaraiah, S/o. Kasaiah, aged about 56 years, Occ: Paster, R/o. Tokapalli Village, Peddaaraveedu Mandal, Prakasam District, A.P. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The Director General of Police, O/o Director General, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The District Collector, Prakasam District, Ongole, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh. 4. The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District, Ongole, Prakasam, Andhra Pradesh. 5. The Sub Inspector, Tarlapadu Police Station, Tarlapadu Mandal, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh. 6. The Tahsildar, Peddaaraveedu Mandal, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh. 7. Uppalapati Chinna Nasaraiah, S/o. Nagaiah, aged about 55 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Tokapalli Village, Peddaaraveedu Mandal, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh. 8. Uppalapati Babu, S/o. Pedda Nasaraiah, aged about 35 years, Occ; Agriculture, R/o. Tokapalli Village, Peddaaraveedu Mandal, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the official respondents in not acting upon the representation dated 15.6.2018 made by the petitioner is bad illegal, arbitrary and violative of Principles of Natural Justice and also against the Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the official respondents to act upon the representation dated 15.6.2018 made by the petitioner. lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the official respondents to provide police protection to the petitioner and his family members from interference of the and 8“" unofficial respondents pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI HARANADHA RAJU KATTA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 6 : SRI Md. FAROOK, ASST.GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.7 & 8 : NONE APPEARED The Court made the following order: 1 APHC010719312018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 34714/2018 Between: 1.Y. NASARAIAH, S/0 KASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC. PASTER, R/0 TOKAPALLI VILLAGE, PEDDAARAVEEDU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI PRADESH. GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA 2.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, 0/0 DIRECTOR GENERAL, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ONGOLE, 4.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5.THE SUBINSPECTOR, TARLAPADU POLICE STATION, TARLAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6.THE TAHSILDAR, PEDDAARAVEEDU MANDAL, DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. PRAKASAM 7.UPPALAPATI CHINNA NASARAIAH, S/0 NAGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/0 TOKAPALLI VILLAGE, YEARS, 2 PEDDAARAVEEDU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 8.UPPALAPATI BABU, S/0 PEDDA NASARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/0 TOKAPALLI VILLAGE, PEDDAARAVEEDU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S); Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the official respondents in not acting upon the representation dated 15.6.2018 made by the petitioner is bad illegal, arbitrary and violative of Principles of Natural Justice and also against the Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the official respondents to act upon the representation dated 15.6.2018 made by the petitioner and to pass lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the official respondents to provide police protection to the petitioner and his family members from interference of the 7th and 8th unofficial respondents pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.HARANADHA RAJU KATTA Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.GP FOR HOME(AP) 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “....to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the official respondents in not acting upon the representation dated 15.6.2018 made by the petitioner is bad illegal, arbitrary and violative of Principles of Natural Justice and also against the Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the official respondents to act upon the representation dated 15.6.2018 made by the petitioner and to pass....” Heard Sri K.Haranadha Raju, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri 2. V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the matter is 3. settled out of the Court between the parties and no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit the 4. Court may pass appropriate orders. Recording the same, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no 5. order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand Cd/. A VIJAYA BABU assistant registrar SECTION OFFICER closed. //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. The Director General of Police, O/o. Director General, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 2. 3. The District Collector, Prakasam District, Ongole, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh. 4. The Superintendent of Police, Prakasam District, Ongole, Prakasam, Andhra Pradesh. 5. The Sub Inspector, Tarlapadu Police Station, Tarlapadu Mandal, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh. 6. The Tahsildar, Peddaaraveedu Mandal, Pradesh. 7. One CC to Sri Haranadha Raju Katta, Advocate [OPUC] 8. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 9. Two CD Copies Prakasam District, Andhra Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:17/07/2025 ORDER WPNO. 34714 OF 2018 of ANO//^ ^ 0 3 SEP 2025 )g «3.\ rent o lL disposing of the w p WITHOUT COSTS