SATISH KUMAR @ PEHALWAN S/O MAHIPAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/5475/2025 · 2025-10-28
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38434 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38434 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:43158] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5475/2025 Satish Kumar @ Pehalwan S/o Mahipal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Dadama Police Station Badra District Charni Dadri (Haryana) (At Present Confined In High Security Jail, Ajmer). ----Applicant Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Shashank Pancholi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 28/10/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 626/2022 registered at Police Station Gudha District Jhunjhunu for the offence(s) under Sections 332, 353, 307, 34 of IPC and under Sections 3, 25 and 27 of Arms Act.
2. Heard and considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant, the opposition made by the learned Public Prosecutor, and perused the material available on record.
3. Taking note of the fact that there are criminal antecedents pending against the applicant; that applicant is absconding; that the allegations leveled herein are of heinous nature; that while tracing the applicant upon encounter, injuries were sustained by police authorities, due to which FIR (supra) was registered and
[2025:RJ-JP:43158] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5475/2025] looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is not inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant.
4. Accordingly, the instant bail application is dismissed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/10