2025:JHHC:34800 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 556 of 2024 ------ Richpal Ram @ Rechpal Ram, son of late Babu Ram, resident of mohalla- Harizan Colony, P.O and P.S. and District- Gumla, Jharkhand. … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Mr. Dilip Kumar, the Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Gumla, Jharkhand. ... Opp. Party(s) With Cont. Case (Civil) No. 562 of 2024 ------ Mahendra Beck, son of Sudershan Beck, resident of village Kassir, P.O and P.S. Raidih, Gumla, Jharkhand. … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Mr. Dilip Kumar, the Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Gumla, Jharkhand. ... Opp. Party(s) With Cont. Case (Civil) No. 566 of 2024 ------ Pando Devi, wife of late Kapil Deo Oraon @ Kapil Oraon, resident of village Asni, P.O Asni, Gumla, Jharkhand. … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Mr. Dilip Kumar, the Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Gumla, Jharkhand. ... Opp. Party(s) With Cont. Case (Civil) No. 567 of 2024 ------ Bimla Devi(B), wife of Madan Ram, resident of Mohalla- Harijan Colony, P.O and P.S. and District- Gumla, Jharkhand. … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Mr. Dilip Kumar, the Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Gumla, Jharkhand. ... Opp. Party(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the petitioner(s): Mr. Akshay Kr. Mahato, Advocate. For Opp. Party(s) M/s Sarvendra Kumar and Ashok Kumar Singh AC to SC (L &C)-III Mr. Anuj Burman, AC to GA-IV ------ 09/21.11.2025: Heard the parties. 2. The Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Gumla is present before this Court. 3. From the show cause, I find that the opposite parties have made payment under the head of pension to the petitioners. In respect of some of them, they have come to a conclusion that some excess amount has been paid so that they are not entitled for the same. 4. Considering the said statement made in the show cause, I am of the opinion that no contempt is made out. Accordingly, these contempts are dropped. 5. Personal appearance of the Officer is dispensed with. 6. Pending interlocutory application, if any, stands disposed of. 7. However, if the petitioners have any grievance, they may approach by filing appropraite application before the appropriate authority. 21st November, 2025 Anu/- (ANANDA SEN, J.) 2.