APHC010718882022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL Between: Srirahul Mannem and Others The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. P VENKATA SUBBARAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed by the Petitioners Accused Nos. 1 to 4 seeking quashment of the proceedings against them in C.C.No.769 of 2021 on the file of the Court of I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10546 OF 2022 Srirahul Mannem and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): P VENKATA SUBBARAO Respondent/complainant(S): NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed by the Petitioners seeking quashment of the proceedings against them in on the file of the Court of I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3396] WEDNESDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed by the Petitioners/ seeking quashment of the proceedings against them in on the file of the Court of I Additional Chief Metropolitan 2. Despite the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, none represented for the Petitioners. 3. The docket proceedings dated 30.01.2025 and 10.02.2025 would show that there is no representation on behalf of the Petitioners. 4. Ms. K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the State is in attendance. 5. In that view, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ DR.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 12.02.2025 . KK