Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38430 (AP)

DODDA RAMAGOPALA RAO, KHAMMAM DT., v. THE STATE OF AP., REP PP & 2 OTRS.,

CRLRC/3099/2016 · 2025-09-08

T Mallikarjuna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010715102016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: Between: 1. DODDA RAMAGOPALA RAO, KHAMMAM DT.,, S/O. LATE PULLAIOAH, AGED 47 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. BANK COLONY, KHAMMAM DISTRICT. 1. THE STATE OF AP REP PP 2 OF POLICE, VEERULAPADU POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. SHAIK JACOB SAHEB, S/O. NAZIRUDDIN, DEEDEKULA, AGED 65 YEARS, R/O. JAYANTHI VILLAGE, VEERULAPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. SHAIK MADAR BEE, W/O. SHAIK YACOB AGED 60 YEARS, R/O. JAYANTHI VILLAGE, VEERULAPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto present this memorandum of grounds of Crl.Rc. aggrieved by the orders in Crl.M.P.No.162/2016 in C.C.No.1054/2105 dated 21.10.2016 on the file of the Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Nandig IA NO: 1 OF 2016(CRLRCMP 4836 OF 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 3099 OF 2016 DODDA RAMAGOPALA RAO, KHAMMAM DT.,, S/O. LATE PULLAIOAH, AGED 47 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. BANK COLONY, KHAMMAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF AP REP PP 2 OTRS, THROUGH SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VEERULAPADU POLICE STATION, KRISHNA SHAIK JACOB SAHEB, S/O. NAZIRUDDIN, DEEDEKULA, AGED 65 YEARS, R/O. JAYANTHI VILLAGE, VEERULAPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. SHAIK MADAR BEE, W/O. SHAIK YACOB SAHEB, DOODEKULA, AGED 60 YEARS, R/O. JAYANTHI VILLAGE, VEERULAPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto present this memorandum of grounds of Crl.Rc. aggrieved by the orders in Crl.M.P.No.162/2016 in C.C.No.1054/2105 dated 21.10.2016 on the file of the Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Nandigama. IA NO: 1 OF 2016(CRLRCMP 4836 OF 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3369] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO DODDA RAMAGOPALA RAO, KHAMMAM DT.,, S/O. LATE PULLAIOAH, AGED 47 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. BANK ...PETITIONER OTRS, THROUGH SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VEERULAPADU POLICE STATION, KRISHNA SHAIK JACOB SAHEB, S/O. NAZIRUDDIN, DEEDEKULA, AGED 65 YEARS, R/O. JAYANTHI VILLAGE, VEERULAPADU MANDAL, SAHEB, DOODEKULA, AGED 60 YEARS, R/O. JAYANTHI VILLAGE, VEERULAPADU ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto present this memorandum of grounds of Crl.Rc. aggrieved by the orders in Crl.M.P.No.162/2016 in C.C.No.1054/2105 dated 21.10.2016 on the file of the Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in C.C.No.1054/2015yn the file of the Additional Judicial I Class Magistrate, Nandigama pending disposal of the Crl.R.C. in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P PRABHAKAR RAO 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. aggrieved by the order dated 21.10.2016 passed in Crl.M.P.No.162 of 2016 in C.C.No.1054 of 2015, passed by the learned Additional Judicial I Class Magistrate, Nandigama, Krishna District. 2. Heard. Perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for both sides submits that the matter has become infructuous due to the disposal of C.C. No. 1054 of 2015. To substantiate this, the parties relied on the e-courts case history, which indicates that C.C. No. 1054 of 2015 was disposed of on 25.04.2018. 4. Considering the submissions made, twhe Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Criminal Revision Case, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Dated: 09.9.2025 TJN 436 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 3099 OF 2016 Dated: 09.9.2025 TJN HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AT AMARAVATI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 3099 OF 2016 PROCEEDING SHEET SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 09.9.2025 TMR, J The Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. (Vide Separate Order) ______ TMR, J TJN