VINDESHWARI PRASAD PATEL v. SHRI PRATAP SINGH BAGHEL SACHIV UTTAR PRADESH BASIC SHIKSHA PARISHAD AND ANOTHER
CAPL/1962/2024 · 2025-09-11
Neeraj Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38429 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38429 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1962 of 2024 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. Heard Sri Arvind Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Yatindra,
learned counsel for the opposite party.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the order of the writ court has been complied with and the application has become infructuous. Therefore, under such facts of the case, no further order is required to be passed. Accordingly, file is consigned to record. September 12, 2025 Junaid Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arvind Kumar Singh, Vishal Tandon Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Vindeshwari Prasad Patel .....Applicant(s) Shri Pratap Singh Baghel Sachiv Uttar Pradesh Basic Shiksha Parishad And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- JUNAID AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad