HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 10324 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned standing counsel for State-respondent no. 1 and Ms. Priyanka Sharma, Advocate holding brief of Sri Abhinava Krishna Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 & 3. 2. Present petition has been filed seeking following relief:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 3 to take appropriate action upon the representation dated 01.03.2025 submitted by the petitioner in regard to the direction to the respondent no. 4 to not stopping the petitioner from ferrying across the Ganga River at Parmat Mandir, Police Station-Gwaltoli, District- Kanpur Nagar." 3. Case was heard on 09.04.2025 and Court has passed following order:- "Mr. Amresh Kumar Singh, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, his client is engaged in ferry services across Ganga River at Parmat Mandir, P.S.-Gwaltoli, District-Kanpur Nagar. The police are causing restraint and obstruction. His client made representation dated 01.03.2025 to the Commissioner of Police, Kanpur Nagar. There has not been any response. Mr. Ambrish Shukla, learned advocate, Additional Chief Standing Counsel appears on behalf of State and Mr. Abhinav Krishna Srivastava, learned advocate, on behalf of respondent no.2. Respondents are to obtain instructions on petitioner's allegations. Put up on 24.04.2025, as fresh. " Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aditaya Kumar Kashyap, Manish Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhinava Krishna Srivastava, C.S.C. Pulli .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. Pursuant to the order dated 09.04.2025, learned standing counsel has produced instruction dated 30.04.2025, which is taken on record. As per instruction, he submitted that there are two parties running ferry service and having some dispute between them. Further, just to maintain law & order, some time they have been stopped from ferrying until settlement between them and the same was lifted after settlement. He next submitted that there is no permanent stoppage for ferry service. 5. Learned counsel for petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 6. Under such facts, no order is required to be passed. 7. File is consigned to the record. October 8, 2025 Sartaj WRIC No. 10324 of 2025 2 (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- SARTAJ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad