Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38415 (RAJ)

NATTHU AND ORS v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR

CRLMP/4265/2016 · 2025-10-13

Anand Sharma

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41741] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4265/2016 1. Natthu S/o Mohal Lal 2. Deepak S/o Natthu Lal 3. Son S/o Natthu Lal 4. Rukmani W/o Natthu Lal 5. Suman D/o Natthu 6. Poonam D/o Natthu All R/o Anand Nagar Bharatpur Police Station Kotwali Bharatpur, Raj. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Th State Of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor 2. Smt. Manju W/o Shri Rajesh Kumar R/o Anand Nagar Bharatpur Police Station, Kotwali Bharatpur. Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hari Krishana Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 13/10/2025 1. In the instant criminal misc. petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing FIR No. 336/2016 registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Bharatpur for the offences under Sections 323, 341, 354 and 504 of IPC. 2. Learned Public Prosecutor submits that the instant criminal misc. petition was filed by the petitioner on 24.08.2016, however only 4 days thereafter, after completing the investigation, the charge-sheet prepared by the Investigating Officer on 28.08.2016 and the same has been filed before the Competent Court on 03.09.2016. Since then, no effective steps have been [2025:RJ-JP:41741] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4265/2016] taken by the petitioner to bring this fact on record and in the meanwhile, trial must have proceeded substantially before the trial Court. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not in a position to dispute the factual report submitted by learned Public Prosecutor. 4. In view of above statement, the criminal misc. petition filed by the petitioner is dismissed. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU /30