P. Ram Mohan Reddy, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/32701/2016 · 2025-08-29
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38409 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38409 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010710992016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] SATURDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 32701/2016 Between:
1. P. RAM MOHAN REDDY,, S/O POLI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, POTTAYAPALLI VILLAGE, BUDVEL MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, COOPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, RAJAMPET, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. CHINNA KESAMPALLI PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY LIMITED, REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, BUDVEL MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE PRESIDENT, CHINNA KESAMPALLI PACS LTD., BUDVEL MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in removing the petitioner vide letter dated 17.09.2016 is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act 1964
2 MRK,J W.P.No.32701 of 2016
and Rules made there under and violative of Article 14, 21 of the Constitution of India, set aside the same IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 40472 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd repondent to continue the petitioner as attender by suspending the letter dated 17.09.2016 issued by the 4th respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WVMP 468 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dt. 27.09.2016, made in WPMP 40472/2016 in W.P.No. 32701/2016 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2017(WVMP 697 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed in WPMP.No. 40472 of 2016 in WP.No. 32701 of 2016 dt. 27.09.2016 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. S APPADHARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. BOBBA VIJAYALAKSHMI
2.
GP FOR COOPERATION (AP)
3 MRK,J W.P.No.32701 of 2016
The Court made the following Order:
The instant Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following relief:
“to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in removing the petitioner vide letter dated 17.09.2016 is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1964 and Rules made there under and violative of Article 14, 21 of the Constitution of India, set aside the same and to pass such other order or orders...”
2. On 27.09.2016, the erstwhile High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad had passed the following interim order:
„Since this Court is prima facie satisfied that the
order of termination was passed without issuing any notice to the petitioner, there shall be interim suspension of the impugned
order, until further orders.‟
3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Srinivasa Basava, learned counsel representing Smt. Bobba Vijaya Lakshmi, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 3 & 4 submits that in spite of obtaining the interim order, the petitioner has never joined in the 3rd respondent - Society. He would also submit that, the petitioner is out of the country.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner not disputed the same. Recording the said submissions made by the respective learned counsels, this Writ Petition is closed. No costs.
4 MRK,J W.P.No.32701 of 2016
Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
Date:30.08.2025 KPV
5 MRK,J W.P.No.32701 of 2016
110
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION No:32701 of 2016
30.08.2025
KPV