1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7320 of 2022  Ramadhin Sinha S/o Mahettar Ram Sinha Aged About 72 Years R/o Khaspara, Pritam Kirana Store, Dhedkohka, Charama, Pin 494337, District Kanker (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. Employees Provident Fund Organisation Through - Commissioner, Regional Office - Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh - Block - D, Scheme 32, Indira Gandhi Commercial Complex, Pandri Raipur (C.G.) 2. Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh, Through Chief Executive Officer, Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr. S.P. Sannat, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. R.S. Patel, Advocate For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Keshav Dewangan, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order On Board 02-09-2025 1) By way of this petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:- i. To set aside the impugned letter dated 02.07.2022. ii. To kindly direct the respondent to disburse the leftover/ remaining arrears from September, 2008 to February, 2009, along Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.09.02 14:05:56 +0530 2 with the interest, from the initial date of disbursement. iii. To kindly make any other order or writ that may be deemed fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case. 2) Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respective respondents submit that respondent No. 2 – Bank in para – 2 of its reply has categorically stated that writ petition was filed on 14.10.2022 whereas arrears pertaining to period between September, 2008 till February, 2009 amounting to Rs. 15,734/- was deposited in the Bank A/c of the petitioner on 15.07.2010 and petitioner has filed this petition suppressing this fact. 3) Heard. 4) From perusal of voucher issued by Accountant of respondent – Bank (Annexure R-2/1), it appears that amount of Rs. 15,734/- has been disbursed by the Accountant of respondent – Bank and same has been deposited into the Bank A/c of the petitioner on 15.07.2010 itself. 5) Taking into consideration the above-discussed facts, in the opinion of this Court, nothing survives for adjudication. Consequently, this petition stands dismissed. However, petitioner would be at liberty to revive if cause of action subsists. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE A j i n k y a