SHALINI TELEVISION NETWORK PVT LTD v. SOFIYA ENTERTAINMENT PVT LTD
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/3/2025 · 2025-01-07
Subramonium Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38401 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38401 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 3/2025
SHALINI TELEVISION NETWORK PVT LTD .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sharath Sampaht, Advocate.
versus
SOFIYA ENTERTAINMENT PVT LTD
.....Respondent
Through: Mr. Aniruddha Deshmukh, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R %
07.01.2025 I.A. 27/2025 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 3/2025
1. This Petition under Section 29A(4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed by the Petitioner for extending the mandate of the Sole Arbitrator.
2. Material on record indicates that a Sole Arbitrator was appointed by this Court on 18.10.2022 in a petition being ARB. P. 227/2022 filed by the Petitioner to adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties. Pleadings stood completed on 01.06.2023. Material on record indicates that the last of the mandate of the Arbitrator was extended mutually by the parties for six months vide Order dated 02.05.2024.
3. It is stated that the arbitration proceedings are at the stage of final
arguments. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 16:31:37
4. It is stated by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner that he withdraws all the allegations made on the conduct of the Respondent and the learned Counsel for the Respondent in the petition.
5. The Apex Court in Rohan Builders (India) Private Limited v. Berger Paints India Limited, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 2494, has held that an application for extension of the time period for passing an arbitral award under Section 29A(4) read with Section 29A(5) is maintainable even after the expiry of the twelve-month or the extended six-month period, as the case may be.
6. In view of the facts of the present case, this Court is inclined to extend the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for a period of one year from today, so that the award can be pronounced.
7. The Petition is disposed of, along with the pending applications, if any.
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J JANUARY 07, 2025 S. Zakir
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 16:31:37