Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38401 (AP)

TIRUPATHI MUNICIPALITY, CHITTOOR DIST. v. R. LOKANADHAM NAIDU, CHITTOOR DIST. & ANO

CMA/1256/2012 · 2025-07-16

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010716362012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1256/2012 Between: 1. TIRUPATHI MUNICIPALITY, CHITTOOR DIST., TIRUPATHI MUNICIPALITY REP. BY M. SANATH KUMAR S/O. M. CHANDRASEKHAR REDDY AGED: 28 YRS. PVT. EMPLOYEE R/O. AT NEW BALAJI COLONY TIRUPATHI CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...APPELLANT AND 1. R LOKANADHAM NAIDU CHITTOOR DIST ANO, PROPRIETOR HOTEL TIRUMALA RESIDENCY, TIRUPATI CHITTOOR DISTRICT 2. PUBLIC OF 19TH WARD, TIRUPATHI MUNICIPALITY REP. BY (2) M. NAGENDRAMMA ...RESPONDENT(S): IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CMAMP 2397 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in OS No. 64/2005 on the file of V Addl. District Judge, Tirupathi pending disposal of CMA and pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1. T C KRISHNAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. . The Court made the following JUDGMENT: Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the cause in the civil miscellaneous appeal does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the appellant, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ SUMATHI JAGADAM,J Dated: 17.07.2025 KAS