Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:30511]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8811 of 2025
Rahul Kumar, aged about 30 years, son of Bijay Ray, Resident of Prem Nagar, Road No. 1, P.O. and P.S. Telco, Jamshedpur Town, District East Singhbhum. … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opp. party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rohan Mazumdar ,Adv. For the State : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Sinha , Addl. .PP.
02 / 26.09.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Telco P.S. Case No. 28 of 2025 ( G.R. Case No. 933 of 2025), instituted under Sections 85 and 103 (1) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 .
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has abetted the commission of the suicide of his wife. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and the charge sheet has already been submitted against the petitioner for having committed the offence punishable under Section 108 of BNS on
28.06.2025. It is next submitted that the petitioner has two minor children to look after and admittedly, the deceased has committed suicide and there is no specific overt act attributed to the petitioner which could have led the deceased to commit suicide. It is further submitted by
learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 24 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 08.04.2025, as mentioned in para 23 of this bail application. It is next submitted by
learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case, hence, the petitioner may be admitted to regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Telco P.S. Case No. 28 of 2025 ( G.R. Case No. 933 of 2025), with the condition that the petitioner will not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Dated 26.09.2025
Smita/-