Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38399 (RAJ)

RAJENDRA S/O SHOBHAGMAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/10571/2025 · 2025-11-11

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:45242] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10571/2025 Rajendra S/o Shobhagmal, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Khatoli, Police Station Uniara, District Tonk. ----Applicant Versus State of Rajasthan through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Ms. Saroj Singh HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 11/11/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 63/2024 registered at Police Station Uniara District Tonk for the offence(s) under Section 3/7 of E.C. Act, 1955. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that vide an order dated 20.09.2025, interim protection from arrest was granted to the applicant subject to the condition that applicant joins investigation. In compliance of the same, the applicant has duly joined the investigation, as undertaken by learned counsel for the applicant. It is further submitted that vide the aforesaid order, time was granted to applicant to deposit certain quantity of goods. It has been undertaken that the same will be deposited by the applicant within a period of fifteen days from the date of this order. [2025:RJ-JP:45242] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10571/2025] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the instant bail application. 4. Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the parties, considering that the accused-applicant has already joined the investigation, as directed, vide an interim order dated 20.09.2025 and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court deems it appropriate to make the order dated 20.09.2025 absolute and allow the anticipatory bail application. 5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Uniara District Tonk in F.I.R. No. 63/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-applicant Rajendra S/o Shobhagmal shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/233