APHC010718542022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL Between: Sura Swarna Latha Sampathirao Sudhakar and Others Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. V N ANAGANI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. G RAMA GOPAL The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed by the Petitioner/ Accused, seeking quashment C.C.No. 19 of 2021 (PR- Magistrate of I Class, Srikakulam IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10553 OF 2022 ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND Sampathirao Sudhakar and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed by the Petitioner/ seeking quashment of the proceedings pending -3145 of 2018) on the file of the I Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Srikakulam IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3396] THURSDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed by the Petitioner/ against him in I Additional Judicial 2. Heard Sri V.N. Anagani, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri G. Rama Gopal, learned counsel for the respondent No.1. and Ms. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the respondent No.2 / State 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of without causing any prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioners, by dispensing the presence of the petitioners before the Trial Court. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. In that view, the Criminal petition is disposed of. However, the petitioners are at liberty to raise all the contentions before the Trial Court in their defence. The presence of the petitioners before the Trial Court is dispensed with unless their presence is specifically directed by the Trial Court. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 30.01.2025 KK THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10553 OF 2022 30.01.2025 KK