Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38397 (BOM)

VIJAY KUMAR SWAMI v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

IA/1044/2025 · 2025-07-17

Shri Ashwin D Bhobe

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

23-IA-1044-2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1044 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2025 Vijay Kumar Swami ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent __________ Mr. Taraq Sayed a/w Ms. Ashwinii Acharii and Mr. Anish Pereira, learned Advocates for the Applicant. Ms. Veera Shinde, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent. Mr. Narayan G. Rokade a/w Mr. Siddharth Ghodke and Mr. Abhang Suryawanshi, learned Advocates for the Complainant/Intervenor. PSI Mr. Gopi Walmiki attached to Vijapur Naka Police Station, District- Solapur is present in the Court. __________ CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 17th JULY 2025. P.C. : 1. Heard Mr. Taraq Sayed, learned Advocate for the Applicant, Ms. Veera Shinde, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent and Mr. Narayan Rokade, learned Advocate for the Complainant/Intervenor. 2. By the present Application, the Complainant is seeking intervention in Criminal Bail Application No. 1 of 2025. Intervenor is the Complainant in the crime, which is subject matter of Sessions Case No. 5 of 2021. 3. Mr. Taraq Sayyed, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Gitalaxmi 23-IA-1044-2025.doc Ms. Veera Shinde, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent do not object to the request made in the intervention application. 4. In view of the no objection and the statements made in the Application, intervention application is allowed. The Intervenor is permitted to intervene in the abovesaid Bail Application. 5. Interim Application No. 1044 of 2025 is disposed of in the abovesaid terms. [ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.] Gitalaxmi GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR Digitally signed by GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR Date: 2025.07.17 21:19:38 +0530