THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA v. BHIKAJI VISHRAM PAWAR AND ORS.
FA/1689/2002 · 2025-04-08
Sharmila U Deshmukh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38395 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38395 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
60 Fa-1689-2002.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1689 OF 2002 State of Maharashtra.
...Appellant. Versus Bhikaji Vishram Pawar and Others. ...Respondents. —————— Mr. A. R. Patil, AGP for Appellant-State. —————— Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : April 8, 2025.
P. C. :
1. First Appeal has been preferred by the State being aggrieved by the judgment and award passed in L.A.R. No. 48 of 1995.
2. Reference Court has enhanced the compensation to Rs. 1,35,000/- from the compensation of Rs.21,496/- awarded by SLAO.
3. Considering the meager enhancement, this Court is not inclined to entertain the First Appeal. First Appeal is dismissed.
4. In view of the dismissal of First Appeal, pending civil / interim applications do not survive and stand disposed of.
[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] Patil-SR 1 of
1 Signed by: Sachin R. Patil Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 11/04/2025 19:32:18