Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010715572011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1373/2011 Between:
1. JOGI RAMULU, S/O LATE PENTAIAH NMR MAZDOOR, VPI SUB- DIVISION, R/O KORADA STREET, SRIKAKULAM.
...PETITIONER AND
1. RAMBABU, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, VAMSADARA PROJECT, INVESTIGATION DIVISION, AMDALAVALASA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
2. K RAMA RAO, DY. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, VAMSADARA PROJECT, INVESTIGATION DIVISION, HIRAMANDALAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to initiate the Contempt proceedings against the respondents and punish them suitably for their deliberate and willful disobedience of the orders dt.31-03-2010 passed by His Lordship the Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Ramulu in W.P.No.1498 of 2005 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2011(APPL 852 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To direct the respondents to regularize the services of the Petitiner forthwith
pending disposal of the contempt case and pass such other order or orders in the interests of justice.
IA NO: 2 OF 2011(APPL 6372 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V SUDHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES III
2. K BHEEMA RAO The Court made the following order: The above contempt case is filed complaining the non-implementation of the order dated 31.03.2010 in W.P.No.1498 of 2005.
2. Today, when the matter is listed, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the sole petitioner died on 09.09.2023.
3. Since no petition to bring the legal representatives of deceased sole petitioner is filed, this contempt case gets abated.
4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is dismissed as abated. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 18.03.2025 TVN
492
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1373 of 2011
Date: 18.03.2025 TVN