Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38392 (RAJ)

PRAKASH SINGH SON OF SHRI RAMSINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/13918/2023 · 2025-10-07

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:40891] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13918/2023 Prakash Singh Son Of Shri Ramsingh, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of Village Khangari, Tehsil Nadbai, District Bharatpur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Revenue-State, Board Of Revenue, Rajasthan, Ajmer. 3. District Collector, Bharatpur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dilip Singh Kurka For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 07/10/2025 1 Learned counsel for petitioner while placing reliance upon judgment in case of Ajay Kumar Choudhary Vs. Union of India Through Its Secretary and Another reported as AIR 2015 SC 2389 submits that present petitioner was placed under suspension vide order dated 25.05.2023 and petitioner is entitled to reinstatement pending inquiry. He further submits that the petitioner was suspended on false allegations and the allegations are not sufficient to warrant suspension in contemplation of enquiry. He further submitted that placing a public servant under suspension for a longer duration is also against the public policy. [2025:RJ-JP:40891] (2 of 2) [CW-13918/2023] 2 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and perused the judgment as referred by learned counsel for petitioner along with material on record. 3 Present petitioner, who was initially appointed as Assistant Administrative Officer was suspended by the District Collector Bharatpur on 25.05.2022. 4 Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to respondent within a period of two weeks from now raising all grounds. The respondents are directed to dispose of the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has right to re-approach the court with fresh petition. 5 Accordingly, the writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /89