WASIM AKBAR S/O RASUL SAB KANCHAGAR v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR AND DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER
WP/104864/2024 · 2025-10-17
Anant Ramanath Hegde
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38391 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38391 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14134 WP No. 104864 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
WRIT PETITION NO.104864 OF 2024 (L-RES)
BETWEEN:
WASIM AKBAR S/O RASUL SAB KANCHAGAR, AGE. 32 YEARS, OCC. MASON, R/O. NO.1221, S.M. KRISHNANAGAR, OLD HUBBALLI-581 325, TQ. HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD.
… PETITIONER (BY SRI. D.J. NAIK, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
DEPUTY DIRECTOR AND DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER, THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KARNATAKA BUILDING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTIONS WORKERS WELFARE BOARD BENGALURU KAOUSALYA BHAVAN, BANNERGATTA ROAD, BENGALURU-560 029.
2.
DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER (DLC), BELAGAVI, DIST. BELAGAVI-590 001.
3.
ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER (ALC), KARMIK BHAVAN, 1ST FLOOR, MAHESH P.U. COLLEGE ROAD, CHAITANYA NAGAR, GOKUL ROAD, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD-581 325.
… RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. GANGADHAR HOSAKERI, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. PRAVEEN K. UPPAR, AGA FOR R2 AND R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER
Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14134 WP No. 104864 of 2024
DATED 21-03-2024, BEARING NO.SUM / SAKAHU / HIMBARAH / 23-24 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 VIDE ANNEXURE-F.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE)
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit the petitioner's application for grant of assistance for the first marriage of the registered building or construction worker is rejected on the premise that necessary documents are not produced.
2. This Court has perused Annexure-F, the endorsement. The application is rejected on the premise that necessary documents are not produced.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that Annexures-C, D, E and G, are the necessary documents.
4. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondents-State would submit that the
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14134 WP No. 104864 of 2024
concerned competent authority will consider the documents and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.
6. The petitioner shall furnish the aforementioned documents, in addition to any other documents insisted in writing by the competent authority, if required.
7. The exercise shall be completed within 30 days from the date of the receipt of the copy of the
order.
Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE
AM CT:BCK LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 13